Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 FSUPP 888 - Meek v. Martinez

Meek v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 3001 (Community Service Senior Opportunities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 3021 · 42 U.S.C. § 3022

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Warth v. Seldin · Monroe v. Pape · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he [area agency on aging] is more than a creature of the State, established for the sole purpose of funneling funds to service providers.... [T]he area agencies have the added function of serving as advocates on behalf of the needs of the elderly.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “serve as the advocate and focal point for older individuals within the community by ... monitoring, evaluating, and commenting upon all policies, programs, hearings, levies, and community actions which will affect older individuals”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'within the zone of interests protected by the [OAA],' which confers 'direct standing' upon it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.