Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 N.E.2d 1087 - Rawley v. State

Rawley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Harrison v. State · Houser v. State · Ajabu v. State · Warlick v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court's statement of reasons (1) must identify each mitigating and aggravating cireumstance found, (M) must include the specific facts and reasons which lead the court to find the existence of each such cireumstance, (i) must articulate that the mitigating and aggravating circumstances have been evaluated and balanced in determination of the sentence, and (iv) must set forth the trial court's personal conclusion that the sentence is appropriate punishment for this offender and this crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The statute provides that life without parole is imposed under the same standards and is subject to the same requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “violations of Miranda are subject to harmless error analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.