Hill v. Burch’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 689 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Hunter · 624 So. 2d 1148 - White v. Westlund · 679 So. 2d 296 - Kokotis v. DeMarco · Shaw v. Shaw · Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rudnick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“which have been paid for the benefit of the claimant, or which are otherwise available to him, from all collateral sources; however, there shall be no reduction for collateral sources for which a subrogation or reimbursement right exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“which encompasses benefits relating to future damages, ... pursuant to section 768.76(1), Fla. Stat. (1997).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.