¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion as untimely and successive. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring-appellant from filing any further pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
724 So. 2d 1261
Colonel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 27, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-01-27
Relies on 717 So. 2d 95 - Spencer v. State · 722 So. 2d 250 - Boston v. State
Decided 1999-01-27