Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 So. 2d 215 - State v. Jackson

724 So. 2d 215 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2015

4 state decisions

20199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lowenschuss v. Resorts International, Inc. · Mays v. United States · State v. Sanders · State v. Young · 406 So. 2d 550 - State v. Bourgeois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court should give weight to the sentencing guidelines and must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence imposed. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 894.1(B) and (C). The trial court is not required to list every aggravating or mitigating factor as long as the record shows ample consideration of the guidelines. Thus, even without full compliance with Article 894.1, remand is unnecessary when the record clearly reflects an adequate basis for the sentence. State v. Ledet, 96-0142, p. 17 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/8/96), 694 So.2d 336, 346 , writ denied, 96-3029 (La.9/19/97), 701 So.2d 163 . Moreover, under Article 881.4(D), an appellate court will not set aside a sentence as excessive if the record supports the sentence imposed. See State v. Bennett, 623 So.2d 74, 78, n. 2 (La.App. 1 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-2128 (La.3/11/94), 634 So.2d 404 [emphasis added].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.