Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 So. 2d 255 - Johns v. Jaramillo

724 So. 2d 255 - Johns v. Jaramillo’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co. · Banks v. State Farm Ins. Co. · Berman v. De Chazal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a proper certification requires specific written reasons for the trial court's determination that an immediate appeal is warranted”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the legislature intended to require that some reason be expressed for the determination that there is no just reason for delay, because Article 1915(B)(1) provides that the designation must be pursuant to `an express determination[,'] and clearly contemplates that more than a mere conclusory statement will be given as a justification for finality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a final judgment for purposes of immediate appeal pursuant to La.Code of Civil Procedure Art.1915(B)(1)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.