Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Gilbert v. California · 618 So. 2d 116 - Stromas v. State · Monk v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once relevancy is determined, for the tape recording to be properly admitted the State must present evidence `sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. State“The State may prove that the tape recording is, in fact, a recording of [White] by `opinion based upon hearing the voice at any time under the circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. State“the informant ... provided the `missing link' which admitted the evidence for the purpose of establishing Martin's involvement in the drug transaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.