Burdess v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 661 So. 2d 75 - DG v. State · 466 So. 2d 1140 - PP v. State · 537 So. 2d 711 - Steele v. State · 481 So. 2d 9 - CT v. State · 500 So. 2d 728 - Caines v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There was no testimony that the officer was impeded in any way by the giving of the original false information. No reports were prepared based on it, nor was any action taken in reliance on it. The information was corrected before it did any harm, and appellant was not being legally detained.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. A.A.R. v. State · AAR v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.