Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 So. 2d 87 - Fincher v. State

724 So. 2d 87 - Fincher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2017

17 state decisions

110199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 556 So. 2d 1094 - Sheats v. State · 666 So. 2d 31 - Owens v. State · Daniel v. State · Ex Parte Weaver · Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the court determines that the petition is not sufficiently specific, or is precluded, or fails to state a claim , or that no material issue of fact or law exists which would entitle the petitioner to relief under this rule and that no purpose would be served by any further proceedings, the court may either dismiss the petition or grant leave to file an amended petition."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he docket fee may be waived initially and taxed as costs at the conclusion of the case if the court finds that payment of the fee will constitute a substantial hardship.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he petition must contain a clear and specific statement of the grounds upon which relief is sought, including full disclosure of the factual basis of those grounds.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.