Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 1996
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fay v. Noia · Fisher v. United States · Fields v. State · Smith v. State · State v. Stidham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Counsel here was appointed by the court. She was the court’s choice to ensure mov-ant’s rights were properly exercised, in particular, to amend the pro se motion if necessary. It is incongruous, to say the least, to choose counsel for movant and then penalize the movant because counsel did not fulfill the duty she was chosen for. In effect, movant’s rights were extinguished without meaningful consideration because of the court’s choice and not due to any apparent fault of movant. Id. at 328 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.