Barrett v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1987
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. · Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [t]here is excepted from this conveyance a one-sixteenth (¾6⅛) royalty interest in and to all of the oil, gas, sulphur and other minerals in and under and that may be produced from the above described tract of land, which said one-sixteenth (½6⅛) royalty interest was reserved unto L.G. Tuer and wife, Iva Mae Tuer, by deed dated July 13, 1946, and recorded in Volume 287, page 372, Deed Records, Liberty County, Texas, to which reference is here made, (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Patrick v. Barrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.