Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 A2D 186 - Commonwealth v. Dellavecchia

Commonwealth v. Dellavecchia’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2024

8 state decisions

501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Valette · Commonwealth v. Comer · Commonwealth v. O'Hanlon · Commonwealth v. Ward · 442 Pa. Super. 12 - Commonwealth v. Chamberlain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Commonwealth may sustain its burden of proving every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt by means of wholly circumstantial evidence. Moreover, in applying the above test, the entire trial record must be evaluated and all evidence actually received must be considered. Finally, the trier of fact while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must determine whether the evidence, and all reasonable inferences, deducible from that, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, are sufficient to establish all the elements of the offenses beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.