Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 A2D 291 - Carr v. Prader

Carr v. Prader’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Fox v. Fox · Petition of Loudin · In Re Kimberly and James · In Re Jonathan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “department of children, youth, and families, the department of health, the department of human services, the department of education, the office of substance abuse, and the department of mental health, retardation, and hospitals to render all assistance [] within [] its jurisdictional power”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “jurisdiction to appoint a guardian of [a child] who is not orphaned and who has a surviving natural parent whose parental rights have never been terminated but whose fitness to serve as the minor's guardian have been raised in the probate proceedings?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]robate [c]ourt does not have jurisdiction to appoint a permanent guardian of [a child] who is not orphaned and who has a surviving natural parent whose parental rights have never been terminated and who opposes [the] petition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.