Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 F.2d 1303 - United States v. Plotke

United States v. Plotke’s Empirical Analysis

725 F.2d 1303 · 1984

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2011 · most notably Holmes v. United States (1984), United States v. Caporale (1986)

27 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

2801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Pereira v. United States · Santoni v. United States · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ejxclusion of relevant evidence pursuant to Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy to be used sparingly.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.