Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 F.2d 238 - North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs v. United States Department of Labor

North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs v. United States Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

725 F.2d 238 · 1984

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2015
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015 · most notably Bennett v. New Jersey (1985), Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health & Human Services (1985)

24 federal appellate ·

3001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 241J · 20 U.S.C. § 2701 · 29 U.S.C. § 801 · 42 U.S.C. § 2571 · 42 U.S.C. § 2701 · 42 U.S.C. § 4871

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Bell v. New Jersey · United States v. Tommarello

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not ... perceive there to be a Chenery problem in the instant case because the question of interpretation of a federal statute is not a determination or judgment which an administrative agency alone is authorized to make.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Chenery] does not prohibit a reviewing court from affirming an agency decision on a ground different from the one used by the agency if the new ground is not one that calls for a determination or judgment which an administrative agency alone is authorized to make.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he interpretation [was] wholly different from what it is in the case where Congress specifically entrusts an administrative agency, because of its special competence, with the task of . . . setting up standards or rules of conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.