Kennedy v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
725 F.2d 269 · 1984
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Alvie James Hale v. Gary Gibson (2000), United States v. Signori (1988)
14 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Brady v. United States · Furman v. Georgia · United States v. Frady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plea entered in reliance on the defendant's attorney's patently erroneous statement of the law in relation to the facts”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Our determination that ... counsel was ineffective mandates the conclusion that his plea of guilty was not “voluntary” in the constitutional sense. A plea of guilty [like a plea of nolo contendere] must be knowing and intelligent to pass constitutional muster [Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) ]. Because such a plea amounts to an admission of all of the elements of the crime charged, “it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 466 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). It is elementary that a plea entered in reliance on the defendant’s attorney’s patently erroneous statement of the law in relation to the facts does not meet this standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Teague v. State“'[A]lthough counsel need not be a fortune teller, he must be a reasonably competent legal historian. Though he need not see into the future, he must reasonably recall (or at least research) the past....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.