Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 F.2d 641 - United States v. Simmons

United States v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis

725 F.2d 641 · 1984

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
February 2016
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably United States of America v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez (2001), United States v. Ocampo (1989)

28 federal appellate ·

2201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Berger v. United States · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Ingram v. United States · United States v. Malatesta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced as follows: (B) In the case of a violation of subsection (a) of this section involving— (iii) 5 grams or more of a mixture or substance described in clause (ii) which contains cocaine base; such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 5 years and not more than 40 years.... 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The statute makes it a crime for a person to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance . . . . [T]he crime can be proved without any consideration of the amount involved . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.