Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 F.2d 645 - Lykins v. Pointer Inc.

Lykins v. Pointer Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

725 F.2d 645 · 1984

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2016 · most notably Finley v. United States (1989), Moore v. Marketplace Restaurant, Inc. (1985)

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

2901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1653 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Moor v. County of Alameda · Aldinger v. Howard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An action shall not be instituted upon a claim against the United States for money damages for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. The failure of an agency to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An action shall not be instituted upon a claim against the United States for money damages for injury, loss of property. . .unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]efore it can be concluded that [pendent party] jurisdiction exists, a federal court must satisfy itself ... that Congress in the statutes conferring jurisdiction has not expressly or by implication negated its existence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.