Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 F.2d 832 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

725 F.2d 832 · 1983

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2015 · most notably Dixon v. United States (2006), United States v. Villegas (1990)

46 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

3101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Leland v. Oregon · Powell v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there was no reasonable opportunity to escape other than by engaging in the otherwise unlawful activity.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[W]e do well to bear in mind the Supreme Court’s observation that “[t]he doctrines of actus reus, mens rea, insanity, mistake, justification, and duress have historically provided the tools for a constantly shifting adjustment of the tension between the evolving aims of the criminal law and changing religious, moral, philosophical, and medical views of the nature of man,” Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514, 536 , 88 S.Ct. 2145, 2156 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1254 (1968).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “distinct element of lack of a reasonable opportunity to escape the threatening situation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.