Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 F.3d 172 - Cotzojay v. Holder

Cotzojay v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

725 F.3d 172 · 2013

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Payton v. New York · Rochin v. People of California · Steagald v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “indicat[e] that the Court requires equally flagrant violations before it is willing to label them 'egregious.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “based on race (or some other grossly improper consideration)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “although an unlawful search does not become an egregious search merely because it invades the privacy of the home, ... that government agents intrude into one’s home (versus a workplace or vehicle, for example) is an important factor in assessing the egregiousness of a Fourth Amendment violation because the home is where its protections should be at their peak.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.