Shearson v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
725 F.3d 588 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 44926 · 5 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Gibson v. Berryhill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“create a record that may be reviewed by a judge in camera”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Amiri v. Nielsen · Kovac v. Wray“'a causal connection [with] the conduct complained of' [and are] 'fairly ... trace[able] to the challenged action of [Defendants], and not ... th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not only that the government wrongly detained her in 2006, but also that, by remaining on the list, the government is "constrain[ing] her right to travel freely internationally, to be treated like others situated similarly to her, and has subjected her to the stigma that attends placement on a government watchlist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Amiri v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.