Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

725 F.3d 968

Docket Nos. 10-16696, 11-16577.

Perry v. Brown

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 2013.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2013-06-28

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2017

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1David Boies, Rosanne C. Baxter, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, Theodore Olson, Matthew McGill, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Christopher D. Dusseault, Theane Evangelis Kapur, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ethan Douglas Dettmer, Esquire, Enrique Antonio Monagas, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeremy Michael Goldman, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flenxer, LLP, Oakland, CA, Theodore H. Uno, Bois Schiller & Flexner LLP, Hollywood, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

¶2Ronald P. Flynn, Therese Stewart, Chief Deputy City, Christine Van Aken, Deputy City, Erin Bernstein, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, Vince Chhabria, Esquire, Dennis J. Herrera, *970City, Mollie Mindes Lee, Deputy City, Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Danny Chou, San Jose, CA, for Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶3Before: REINHARDT, HAWKINS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶4The stay in the above matter is dissolved effective immediately.

/725/f3d/968 · .json · Public domain