Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 FSUPP 1324 - Wilder v. Bernstein

Wilder v. Bernstein’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
August 1997
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'numerous changes--some minor, some substantial--that address virtually all of the concerns raised by the intervenors.' " 725 F.Supp. at 1329 (quoting 645 F.Supp. at 1348 ). 20 Given their "comprehensive”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he intervenors worked to promote a more viable solution to the problems presented by the foster care system in New York, while at the same time assuring that the best interests of all children in the system were taken into account.... they played an essential role in forging the final version of the Stipulation which was acceptable to all the parties except the sectarian agencies....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “direct participation in the New York City foster care system, and their ongoing contact with the children in care, give them the ability and incentive to comment authoritatively on the likely impact of the settlement on agency administrators and clinicians and on the children they serve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.