Stott v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 3001 (Community Service Senior Opportunities Act)
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“position-by-position analysis, taking into consideration both the description of the job, if there is one, and such other evidence as is available on the actual duties performed by the occupant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Howard H. Haworth, Individually, and James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, and Howard H. Haworth, Individually James S. Lofton, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Department of Administration Grace J. Rohrer, Individually, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James T. Broyhill David T. Flaherty, and James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Howard H. Haworth, Individually, and James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina · Stott“no permanent employee subject to [the Act] shall be discharged, suspended or reduced in pay or position except for just cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Howard H. Haworth, Individually, and James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, and Howard H. Haworth, Individually James S. Lofton, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Department of Administration Grace J. Rohrer, Individually, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James T. Broyhill David T. Flaherty, and James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Howard H. Haworth, Individually, and James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, Bobby Stott Joseph Register Lonnie Michael Cayton, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. James G. Martin, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina · Stott“1.Policy-making Functions 1. Provides executive management to the institution involving supervision, direction, planning, policymaking/interpre-tation/administration and comprehensive coordination of the treatment program, academic/vocational program, residential program, fiscal operations, and support services. 2. Develops, implements, and enforces all policies and procedures relating to the institution and its management. 3. Serves as a member of the divisional management team where he is responsible for recommending, reviewing, and implementing policies and procedures to guide the entire division. 4. Plans the work operations, sets priorities and deadlines, and establishes goals for the institution. 5. Interprets and implements court orders. 6. Forecasts budget needs, changes in population, trends and laws, and facility/vehicle/equipment renovation and/or replacement needs. 7. Develops expansion budget requests, determines spending priorities, develops capital improvement requests, and supervises capital improvement projects. 2.Representative Functions 1. Maintains regular contact with the general public through the news media and speechmaking. 2. Maintains regular contact with judges, court personnel, related agency employees through conferences, professional meetings, and appointments. 4. Personnel Duties 1. Has responsibility for hiring, promoting, suspending, firing, and reassigning employees at the institution. 2. Is the immediate supervisor for all employees at the i”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.