Dooner v. NMI LTD.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2011
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 18A (Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976) · 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Foman v. Davis · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not establish horizontal commonality as the sole measure to determine the common enterprise element of the investment contract test”); Marc. I. Steinberg & William E. Kaulbach, The Supreme Court and the Definition of ‘Security’: The ‘Context’ Clause, ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis, and their Ramifications, 40 VandX.Rev. 489, 519, 520 (noting that although”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.