725 F. Supp. 40 - Schaefer v. Cheney’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 4348
Relies on Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Weinberger · Doe v. Weinberger · 461 F. Supp. 1085 - Hickey v. Commandant of the Fourth Naval District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable return to the Army following the expenditure of public funds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fontana v. White“a fair quid pro quo for [its] investment in personnel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fontana v. White“one of the fundamental purposes of requiring”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fontana v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.