Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 NE2D 842 - Noble v. State

Noble v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Liteky et al United States · Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Schoonover · 45 Cal. 3d 744 - People v. Belmontes · Wright v. State · Levene & Eisenberg v. Gold Coast Asset Acquisition, L. P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “judges have a duty to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary and must thus refrain from engaging in conduct that would ereate a perception 'that the judge's ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Rules of Evidence require that the substance of the evidence be made known to the trial court and that the offer to prove identify the grounds for admission and the relevance of the testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “involves comparing the statute defining the alleged lesser{-Jincluded offense with the charging information in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.