Marchetti v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “I, Joe Brannon, a law enforcement officer employed by the Indianapolis Police Department, swear or affirm that I believe and have good cause to believe that the following described property will have controlled substances within at a certain time in the future. THE PROPERTY Here after [sic] referred to as (THE PROPERTY) is described as follows: address of house: 2217 Groff, Indpls, IN 46222 physical description: Brown Cardboard Box, 11 x 13 x 1, bearing tracking # 813544300735 This affiant bases his belief on the following information that I either have personal knowledge of or received from other law enforcement officers who had personal knowledge of the events: On July 15th 2000, a search warrant was obtained to open parcel(s) described as follows: addressed to: Indpls, IN 46222 R. Rios, 2217 Groff, sender's information: Elias Diaz, 10505 Dorothy AVE, S. Gatel,] CA 90280 which was/were found en route via a private parcel company addressed to THE PROPERTY described above. Upon serving that warrant on July 15th at 8:55 o'clock AM, law enforcement officers opened the parcel(s) and found that it/they contained controlled substances, specifically suspected COCAINE. Officers resealed the parcel(s), and have arranged to make a controlled delivery of this/these pareel(s) to the address noted on the pareel(s), which is THE PROPERTY. This affiant expects that such delivery will be made on July 15th 2000, at approximately 11:00 o'clock AM, by a law enforcement officer. This Affiant ex”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rios v. State

2. “[wlhere the reasonable inferences drawn from the totality of the circumstances establish that there is probable cause to search, a search warrant may be validly issued prior to the actual arrival of the matter to be seized at the premises to which the warrant is directed.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rios v. State