State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · State v. Griller · State v. Taylor · State v. LaTourelle · State v. Glaze
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) there [is] no confrontation problem presented by the admission of the statement as substantive evidence because the declarant testifies], admit[s] making the statement, and [is] available for cross-examination; (2) there [is] no dispute that the declarant made the statement and no dispute as to what the statement containfs]; (3) the statement [is] against the declarant’s penal interest; and (4) the state introduced [ ] evidence [that] point[s] strongly toward the guilt of the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.