Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

725 So. 2d 1148

Docket No. 96-05281.

Thomas v. State

Tommy THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1998.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-11-06

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2000

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*1149 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Tommy Thomas appeals the trial court's revocation of his probation and also seeks correction of a scrivener's error in the revocation order. The evidence presented at the revocation hearing supports the trial court's determination that Thomas wilfully violated his probation and, therefore, we affirm the revocation order. Because Thomas failed to seek correction of the scrivener's error in the trial court and because the error is not fundamental, he is precluded from raising this issue on appeal. See § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996).

¶5Affirmed.

¶6BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

/725/so2d/1148 · .json · Public domain