¶1After careful consideration of the well-presented arguments to the contrary, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s disal-lowance of a defense peremptory challenge. Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).
¶2Affirmed.
725 So. 2d 1274
Chester v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 17, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-02-17
Relies on Melbourne v. State
Decided 1999-02-17