Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 So. 2d 1291 - State v. Juluke

725 So. 2d 1291 - State v. Juluke’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

166
cited by 166 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

164 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 166 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 750 So. 2d 1036 - State v. Hotoph (1999), 943 So. 2d 362 - State v. Marshall (2006)

164 state decisions

1000199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 166 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “serve as a vehicle for a reviewing court to second guess the rational credibility determinations of the fact finder at trial.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “|<)The Jackson standard also does not provide a defendant with a means of splitting alternative and inconsistent defenses in different forums, raising one defense before the jury and when that fails, a second defense [presupposing] a different set of facts in an appellate court conducting sufficiency review under Jackson and La.C.Cr.P. art. 821(E).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.