Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 SO2D 613 - Evans v. State

Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

214
cited by 214 later decisions
5
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 202 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Neal v. Puckett (2002), 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State (2003)

1 federal appellate · 202 state decisions

1460199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Colorado v. Connelly · Oregon v. Elstad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contemplates liberal freedom of speech and range of discussion confined only to bounds of logic and reason; and if counsel's argument is with the limits of proper debate, it is immaterial whether it is sound or unsound or whether he employs wit, invective, and illustration therein.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] lesser included offense instruction should be granted unless the trial judge—_and ultimately this Court—_can say, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the accused, and considering all reasonable references which may be drawn in favor of the accused from the evidence, that no reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty of the lesser included offense (and conversely not guilty of at least one essential element of the principal charge).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “not to be swayed by mere sentiment, conjecture, sympathy, passion, prejudice, public opinion or public feeling,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.