Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 SW2D 214 - Ex Parte Eureste

Ex Parte Eureste’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2017

8 state decisions

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Cardwell · Ex Parte Moorehouse · Ex Parte Trillo · Zapata v. State · Ex Parte Supercinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the only court that may determine whether the applicant may be allowed bail or required to remain in jail”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is no remedy or right of appeal from an order of contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re BCC
  3. “Second Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.