Primrose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2014
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Clapp v. State · Beck v. State · Ex Parte Derese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[former appellate rule 44 (now appellate rule 31)] [10] clearly contemplates direct appeals `in habeas corpus and bail proceedings. ...' That appeal is to be `taken to the court of appeals'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramos v. State · Keaton v. State“the right of appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals of this State is expressly accorded the accused for a review of any judgment or order made”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sanchez v. State · Benford v. State“habeas corpus is the proper vehicle for people held without bail under indictment for a capital offense,” and that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keaton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.