Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 725 SW2D 588 - Commonwealth v. Rose

Commonwealth v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably 603 So. 2d 412 - Ex Parte Haney (1992), Slaughter v. Commonwealth (1987)

25 state decisions

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State · United States v. Barker · Lantrip v. Commonwealth · Ford v. Commonwealth · Koester v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “tends to explain why a person suffering from the syndrome would not leave her mate and would be driven by fear of continuing episodes of increased aggression against herself to perceive certain conduct was necessary in her self-defense, even though another person not suffering from such a condition might believe or behave differently.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Notwithstanding the language in Gray , there may be, as there is in this case, evidence supporting either view, self-defense or wantonness, depending on how the jury should view the evidence. ... Very often, as in this case, the fact of killing is unambiguous but the accused’s mental state at the time of the killing presents a mixed picture.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The need for self-defense must be viewed subjectively from the standpoint of the accused, not objectively from the standpoint of a reasonable person. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.