State v. Peacock’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Prier · State v. Arnold · State v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is elemental that due process includes the right to have a fair trial be- . fore an impartial jury that, has not been influenced by anything other than properly introduced evidence, the court’s instructions, and .the attorneys’ arguments. That right is threatened if self-appointed guardians, of the public’s morals are permitted, through speech, gestures, demonstrations and the-like, to make a calculated attempt to improperly coerce the jury into adopting the watchdog group’s point of view. Courts should be extremely-vigilant to ensure that such demonstrations do not occur, and, if they do, to take immediate corrective action..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person commits the crime of promoting prostitution in the third degree if he knowingly promotes prostitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.