Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 726 F.2d 1068 - Hasty v. Rust Engineering Co.

Hasty v. Rust Engineering Co.’s Empirical Analysis

726 F.2d 1068 · 1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hicks v. Miranda · Mandel v. Bradley · Boswell, Inc. v. Harkins · Ellerbe v. Otis Elevator Co. · Sowders v. M.W. Kellogg Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statute provides an absolute defense to a registered or licensed architect or engineer once more than ten years have passed since the substantial completion of any allegedly defective improvement to real property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Since article 5536a was enacted in 1968 and plaintiff's injury did not occur until 1982, plaintiff ... did not have a vested property right which comes within constitutional protection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.