Armada Coal Export, Inc. v. Interbulk, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
726 F.2d 1566 · 1984
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 750 So. 2d 633 - Seifert v. US Home Corp. (1999), Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping & Trading Inc. (2001)
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · D. J. McDuffie, Inc. v. Old Reliable Fire Insurance · Old Dutch Farms, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local Union No. 584 · Fuller v. Guthrie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The authorities and Armada's arguments persuade us that Armada's claims for wrongful attachment and conversion are, indeed, proper issues for the judiciary rather than matters intended, under the terms of the charter party, for arbitration. While certainly there is a connection between Armada's claims and the charter party relationship between Armada and Interbulk — i.e. , but for the two parties having entered into this business arrangement which was imperfectly performed, there would have been no wrongful attachment and conversion — such connection is not sufficiently close to constitute a dispute arising during the execution, or performance, of the charter party itself."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny dispute arising during the execution of the Charter Party”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.