Calder v. Crall’s Empirical Analysis
726 F.2d 598 · 1984
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2016
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 3012 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 33 U.S.C. § 933 · 5 U.S.C. § 2105 · 5 U.S.C. § 8171 · 5 U.S.C. § 8173
Relies on Feres v. United States · Standard Oil Co of California v. Johnson · United States v. Hopkins · English v. Cunningham · United States v. Forfari
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right to compensation or benefits under this chapter shall be the exclusive remedy to an employee when he is injured ... by the negligence or wrong of any other person or persons in the same employ: Provided, That this provision shall not affect the liability of a person other than an officer or employee of the employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Traywick v. Juhola“The activities of a NAFI are not funded by congressional appropriation. Thus, the salaries and worker's compensation benefits of NAFI employees are paid out of the earnings generated by the activities of the NAFI.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.