Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP’s Empirical Analysis
726 F.3d 290 · 2013
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allow[s] courts to invalidate agreements that prevent the 'effective vindication' of a federal statutory right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he FLSA does not include a 'contrary congressional command' that prevents the underlying arbitration agreement from being enforced by its terms.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“prospective waiver of a party's right to pursue statutory remedies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.