Ojeda-Calderon v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
726 F.3d 669 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252B (§ 242b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Yu Zhao v. Gonzales · Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Gomez-Palacios v. Holder · Singh v. Gonzales · Soberal-Perez v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reaches the correct address but does not reach the alien through some failure in the internal workings of the household, the alien can be charged with receiving proper notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nunez v. Sessions“On a motion to reopen, ... the focus is whether the alien actually received the required notice and not whether the notice was properly mailed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nunez v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.