¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
726 N.W.2d 33
Docket Docket Nos. 131601, 131602, 131603, COA Nos. 247297, 253201, 254295.
KASBEN v. Hoffman
William E. KASBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beryl W. HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Decided January 29, 2007.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2007-01-29
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2013
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-01-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →