Wendel v. Hauser’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

cited by 2 later decisions

states following

March 2003

most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 618 So. 2d 177 - Tanner v. Hartog · 559 So. 2d 195 - Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. · 589 So. 2d 404 - Novitsky v. Hards · Walt Disney World Co. v. Memorial Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“a claim arising out of the rendering of, or the failure to render, medical care or services.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 842 So. 2d 804 - Walker v. Virginia Ins. Reciprocal · 765 So. 2d 229 - Virginia Ins. Reciprocal v. Walker
“more narrowly defines those claims subject to presuit screening procedures than did its predecessor [statute which was at issue in Walt Disney ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 842 So. 2d 804 - Walker v. Virginia Ins. Reciprocal
“the presuit screening procedures initiated by [the plaintiff] did not toll the time for filing [the] action for contribution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 842 So. 2d 804 - Walker v. Virginia Ins. Reciprocal

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.