Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 726 So. 2d 39 - State v. Hayes

726 So. 2d 39 - State v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Berkemer v. McCarty · State v. Oliveaux

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when it relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “did knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance to wit: Heroin ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he only relevant inquiry in determining whether there was a formal arrest or a restraint on the freedom of movement of the degree associated with an arrest is `how a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood the situation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.