Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 726 SO2D 572 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2013

7 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins · Hodel v. Indiana · Dodge v. Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder both federal and state due process clauses, it must be shown that the [statute] was rationally or reasonably related to a proper legislative purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Legislature is the appropriate branch of the government to deal with this matter because it can conduct hearings to determine the extent of the need, the amount of funds required, and the numerous related factors involved. While the legislature can view the full spectrum of the problem, the courts, which do not have the means or facilities to adequately study the problem or provide the remedy, can only deal with the problem on a case by case basis. Mississippi Municipal Ass'n, Inc. v. State, 390 So.2d 986, 988 (Miss.1980) (citations omitted). For these reasons, the ... judgement of the trial court [declaring the statutory amendments unconstitutional] is reversed and rendered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen a statute can be interpreted either as constitutional or unconstitutional, the Supreme Court has long held that they will adopt the constitutional construction. If possible, they will construe it so as `to enable it to withstand the constitutional attack and to carry out the purpose embedded in the [statute].'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.