¶1In this petition for a writ of habeas corpus involving pretrial detention of a juvenile, the trial judge found probable cause to charge this accused with aiding and abetting a battery during a robbery. The probable cause affidavit states that the accused participated in the robbery as a lookout and that the codefendant ran into and knocked the victim down as both were fleeing the scene of the robbery. We cannot say that the trial judge erred in his finding, for the affidavit expressly states that the accused participated in the robbery and acted as the lookout.
¶2As appellate judges, moreover, we do not ourselves make findings, only legal con-*828elusions. Because the affidavit states the accused’s participation in the crime of robbery and the battery occurred during the course of the robbery, we conclude that the affidavit is legally sufficient to charge the accused as an aider and abetter in the crime of battery on a person 65 or older.
¶3PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS DENIED.
¶4dissenting.
¶5Because I find no probable cause to support petitioner’s arrest for battery, I would grant the petition and remand to the trial court to recalculate the detention risk assessment calculation and to reconsider the detention order. I do not believe that the affidavit can support a conclusion that this, defendant had the necessary intent for a criminal battery.