Bobbitt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Martin County, Florida v. Makemson Et Al.; And Okeechobee County, Florida v. Dennis Et Al. · 491 So. 2d 1109 - Makemson v. Martin County · 537 So. 2d 1376 - White v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF PINELLAS CTY. · 361 So. 2d 135 - Rose v. Palm Beach Cty. · 559 So. 2d 1132 - Remeta v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be compensated at an hourly rate fixed by the chief judge or senior judge of the circuit in an amount not to exceed the prevailing hourly rate for similar representation rendered in the circuit....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the trial court ... departed from the essential requirements of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.