Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 726 SW2D 198 - Garza v. Harney

Garza v. Harney’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2016

19 state decisions

1201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garza v. Alviar · Crane v. Tunks · Callahan v. Giles · Wortham v. Walker · McElreath v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The appropriate authorities of every State shall enforce according to its terms, and shall not modify except as provided in subsection (f) of this section, any child custody determination made consistently with the provisions of this section by a court of another State. [[Image here]] (c) A child custody determination made by a court of a State is consistent with the provisions of this section only if— (2) one of the following conditions is met: (C) the child is physically present in such State and (i) the child has been abandoned, or (ii) it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because he has been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse; (emphasis added)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(A) is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding; or, (B) had been the child’s home state within six months before the date of the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from the state because of his removal or retention by a person claiming his custody or for other reasons, and a parent or person acting as parent continues to live in the former home state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The general policies of this subchapter extend to the international area. The provisions of this subchapter relating to the recognition and enforcement of custody decrees of other states apply to custody decrees and decrees involving legal institutions similar in nature to custody institutions rendered by appropriate authorities of other nations if reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard were given to all affected persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.