Evinger v. McDaniel Title Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2019
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America · Scheibel v. Hillis · Jones v. Texas · State v. Crow · Reproductive Health Services, Inc. v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Instruction No. 5 Your verdict must be for plaintiff Heather Ladish, if you believe: First, defendant Stephen M. Gordon, D.O. either: Scheduled the laser procedure for December 28, 1987, or Failed to personally examine Heather Ladish after the procedure of December 28, 1987, until January 2, 1988, or Failed to advise plaintiff Heather Ladish to separate the labial lips until January 2, 1988, or Failed to give plaintiff Heather Ladish any pain medication in the Emergency Room before separating her labial lips on January 2, 1988, or On January 11, 1988, prescribed Efudex to plaintiff Heather Ladish, and Second, defendant Stephen M. Gordon, D.O., in any one or more of the respects submitted in Paragraph First, was thereby negligent, and Third, as a direct result of such negligence plaintiff sustained damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ladish v. Gordon“Proof of fair market value cannot be supplied by evidence as to the value of the property to the plaintiff individually, as a witness’ subjective opinion or his feeling ... as to the value of property may not be equated with or substituted for fair market value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Breiding v. Wells“defined as the price which property will bring when it is offered for sale by an owner who is willing but under no compulsion to sell and is bought by a buyer who is willing or desires to purchase but is not compelled to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.